Skip to Content
Rajiv Ohri & Associates
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
  • About Us
  • Blogs
  • Contact us
Rajiv Ohri & Associates
      • Home
      • Practice Areas
      • About Us
      • Blogs
      • Contact us
  • All Blogs
  • RA Law Briefs
  • ™️ Trademark Objections in India: Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
  • ™️ Trademark Objections in India: Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

    Author: Adv. Rahul Ohri
    31 August 2025 by
    ™️ Trademark Objections in India: Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
    Rajiv Ohri & Associates

    Introduction

    Many startups and small businesses in India file for trademark registration, believing it’s a straightforward process. But here’s the reality:

    More than 40% of applications receive an objection from the Trademark Registry.

    These objections don’t mean your mark is rejected outright. They just mean the Registrar needs clarification or sees a potential conflict. The problem is, most business owners either ignore the objection or reply casually, which almost always leads to rejection.

    At our firm, we’ve handled multiple trademark objections for MSMEs, startups, and even individual entrepreneurs. The patterns are clear:

    most objections arise from avoidable mistakes at the filing stage.


    ⚠️ 1. Filing Without a Proper Trademark Search

    One of the biggest traps is filing without checking if a similar or identical mark already exists.

    Example: 

    A client filed “GlideTech” without a search. The Registry objected since “Glidetechno” was already registered in a similar class.

    Costly result: 

    Extra legal fees, lost time, and risk of rejection.

    How to Avoid:

    Always do a comprehensive trademark search (not just a casual Google search). Check spelling variations, phonetic similarities, and related classes.


    📂 2. Incorrect Class Selection

    Many businesses don’t know that trademarks in India are categorized into 45 classes. If you pick the wrong one, your mark may be useless for your actual business.

    Example: 

    We had a client offering SaaS software, but they filed under Class 9 (hardware) instead of Class 42 (software services).

    Objection: Obvious objection - why the class doesn’t match the business activity.

    How to Avoid:

    • Understand which core + allied classes your business falls under.
    • If your business is expanding (ex: retail + online services), consider filing in multiple classes.


    📝 3. Descriptive or Generic Marks

    Marks that are too generic (“Fast Delivery,” “Best Furniture”) or descriptive of the service/product often face objections.

    Example: 

    Someone applied for “Pure Desi Ghee” as a mark. The Registry objected since it directly describes the product.

    How to Avoid:

    • Add a distinctive element (ex: “Shivam’s Pure Desi Ghee”).
    • Use creative words, logos, or unique spellings.


    📑 4. Poorly Drafted Trademark Application

    Many objections arise because of incomplete details:

    • No proper user affidavit (for claiming prior use)
    • Missing proof of first use date
    • Vague description of goods/services

    We recently handled an objection where the applicant claimed use since 2015 but had no invoices or documents to prove it. 

    How to Avoid:

    • File supporting docs upfront (invoices, packaging, website screenshots).
    • Draft the application with care, not as a tick-box exercise.


    ⚖️ 5. Not Replying to Objections on Time

    This is the biggest mistake we see. Trademark objections have a 30-day response deadline. Miss it, and your application is abandoned automatically.

    Example: 

    A client came to us 40 days after receiving an objection. Nothing could be done except refiling the mark, losing 6+ months.

    How to Avoid:

    • Track deadlines carefully.
    • File a well-reasoned reply with evidence within time.
    • If needed, request a hearing before the Registrar.


    🧠 Real Cases We’ve Resolved 


    🔹 Case 1: 

    A health startup’s mark was objected due to similarity. We prepared a detailed reply highlighting distinct logo, packaging, and target audience. And the result → Mark accepted.

    🔹 Case 2: 

    A fintech filed under the wrong class. We re-filed fresh application under correct Class, and salvaged the brand’s protection.

    🔹 Case 3: 

    A manufacturer had a descriptive name. An obvious objection was raised. We argued that long-standing use and market recognition had made it distinctive. Hence the result → Accepted.


    📌 Checklist to Overcome Trademark Objections


    ✅ Do a full trademark search before filing

    ✅ Choose the correct class(es)

    ✅ Avoid purely descriptive words

    ✅ File complete docs (affidavit, proof of use)

    ✅ Reply within 30 days of objection

    ✅ Use professional drafting — weak replies = rejection


    Conclusion

    Trademark objections aren’t the end of the road, but they are a test of how strong your brand protection strategy is.

    For business owners, the real mistake is not the objection itself but ignoring it or handling it casually. Handled properly, objections can be overcome, and your mark can proceed to registration smoothly.


    📞 Need Help Overcoming a Trademark Objection?


    At Rajiv Ohri & Associates, we assist startups, MSMEs, and growing brands in:

    • Drafting strong replies to objections
    • Handling Registry hearings
    • Ensuring smooth passage to registration

    👉 Don’t let an objection kill your brand protection. Contact us today for expert help.

    in RA Law Briefs

    Read Next
    Builder-Buyer Agreements in Delhi NCR: Hidden Clauses Every Homebuyer Must Check
    Author: Adv. Rahul Ohri
    • Home
    • About us 
    • Practice Areas    Blogs
    •                                                                                                                           

    Social Media

    Social Media

    © Rajiv Ohri & Associates. All rights reserved.
    Powered by Odoo - Create a free website
    Rajiv Ohri & Associates Logo

    DISCLAIMER

    The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges and agrees that:

    • The user is accessing this website to obtain general information about Rajiv Ohri & Associates, its areas of practice, and legal professionals, purely for their own information and use.
    • The information provided herein has been made available only upon the user’s specific request and is not intended to advertise or solicit legal services.
    • Any content or material on this website does not constitute legal advice or create a lawyer–client relationship.
    • Rajiv Ohri & Associates is not liable for any action taken or not taken by the user based on material from this website. For any legal issue, independent legal advice must be sought.

    I AGREE EXIT